WebJan 1, 2024 · Arbitration — Dispute — Jurisdiction — Submission of dispute to Arbitral Tribunal — Belgium — Netherlands Arbitration Agreement 2003 — Applicable law — International law — Relevance of European law — Role of tribunal in relation to European Community law — EC Treaty, Article 292 — Arbitral Award — Allocation of costs — … Web2.5 Use of the Iron Rhine 9 2.6 Current state of the Iron Rhine 10 2.7 "Belgiums first steps towards revitalisation" 11 2.8 The Tractebel Report 14 2.9 Modal Shift 15 2.10 Belgium's request to reactivate the Iron Rhine 18 2.11 The establishment of the future scenario for the Iron Rhine 18 2.12 The Memorandum of Understanding of March 2000 19
In the Arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (“Ijzeren Rijn”) Railway ...
WebThe author acted as co-agent in the Iron Rhine case. The opinions in this essay are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. 1 Arbitration Regarding the Iron Rhine (“IJzeren Rijn”) Railway (Belgium/Netherlands), Award of 24 May 2005. WebIron Rhine Railway Arbitration! (Ad Hoc Arbitral Tribunal - Award of 24 May 2005) In July 2003, Belgium and the Netherlands agreed to submit to arbitration a dispute over the allocation of costs arising from the reactivation of a railway running from Antwerp, across Dutch territory, to Germany. databricks feature store unity catalog
Iron Rhine Arbitration, Belgium v Netherlands, Award, ICGJ 373 …
WebBELGIUM AND THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, DECISION OF 24 MAY 2005 SENTENCE ARBITRALE RELATIVE AU CHEMIN DE FER DIT IRON RHINE (“IJZEREN RIJN”) … WebKingdom of the Netherlands1 Arbitration Tribunal2 (Judge Higgins, President; Professor Schrans, Judge Simma, Professor Soons and Judge Tomka, Members) Award.24May 2005 Interpretation of Award.20September 2005 Summary: The facts:—The Iron Rhine3 railway, which linked the port of Antwerp, Belgium to the Rhine Basin in Germany, via the … WebJan 10, 2016 · Arbitration (PCA) in the Arbitration Regarding The Iron Rhine (‘Ijzeren Rijn’) Railway (Belgium v Netherlands)19 that ‘the requirement where development may cause significant harm to the environment, there is a duty to prevent, or at least mitigate such harm has now become a databricks feature table